$164.48M in FY2025 revenue, 15.2% growth. U.S. revenue +101.6% in H1 FY2026. International APAC revenue nearly doubled. Fortune 500 financial institution clients conducted vendor diligence and chose CLPS. The China discount is applied to a company that primarily serves Western financial institutions.
CLPS Technology reported $164.48M in revenue for fiscal year 2025. 15.2 percent growth from $142.81M in FY2024. H1 FY2026 (July through December 2025) revenue was $85.09M, up 18.55 percent year-over-year. U.S. revenue in H1 FY2026 was $4.1M; up 101.6 percent year-over-year. International APAC revenue (excluding China) grew from $16.9M to $26.8M. Cash at December 31, 2025 was $28.4M, essentially flat with $28.2M at June 30, 2025.
The analytical reality is that CLPS provides IT development services to major global financial institutions; banks and financial services companies that subject every vendor to rigorous security, compliance, and technical due diligence. These clients did not choose CLPS casually. They evaluated the company against alternatives and signed multi-year relationships. The client count grew from 225 to 277 between H1 FY2025 periods.
The Human Translation: The IT Services Firm With a Geography Problem. CLPS serves Western financial institutions but has development capacity primarily in China. Institutional investors apply a uniform China risk premium regardless of whether the specific business risk matches the broad geopolitical narrative. CLPS's actual customers are regulated Western banks; the geopolitical risk that applies to Chinese consumer technology does not apply to a company whose revenues come from JPMorgan's IT budget, not China's domestic market.
The U.S. revenue growth rate. 101.6 percent in H1 FY2026; is the clearest signal that geographic diversification is working. Customized IT solutions grew 134.7 percent year-over-year in the same period. The company is actively building a revenue base outside China to reduce the concentration of development capacity and client base simultaneously.
FY2025 net loss was $7.0M on $164.48M in revenue, a net margin of approximately -4.3 percent. EBITDA was -$3.5M. The gross margin (the share of revenue left after direct costs) was 23.1 percent in H1 FY2025. The path to profitability requires either revenue scale continuing to outpace cost growth or margin expansion from higher-value service offerings.
The China discount is the dominant analytical factor affecting CLPS valuation, and it requires careful examination because the discount may be misapplied to this specific company. CLPS is headquartered in Hong Kong with development centers in mainland China, but its primary customers are Western financial institutions; global banks, insurance companies, and financial services firms that operate under the most stringent regulatory, security, and vendor management frameworks in the world. These institutions did not choose CLPS casually. They conducted vendor due diligence that includes security audits, data protection assessments, business continuity reviews, and reference checks. The fact that Fortune 500 financial institutions chose CLPS after this diligence process is itself a validation of the company operational and security standards that the broad China discount does not account for.
The U.S. revenue growth of 101.6 percent year-over-year in H1 FY2026 is the most important metric for investors evaluating the geographic diversification thesis. If CLPS revenue were entirely generated in and dependent on the Chinese domestic market, the China discount would be analytically appropriate because geopolitical risks; tariffs, sanctions, regulatory restrictions, could directly impact the revenue base. But when U.S. revenue is doubling annually and international APAC revenue outside China is growing from $16.9M to $26.8M, the revenue base is actively diversifying away from the concentration that justifies the discount. Each quarter that U.S. and international revenue grows as a percentage of total revenue reduces the relevance of the China risk premium because a smaller fraction of the business is exposed to the specific risks the discount is pricing.
The IT services business model that CLPS operates deserves examination because it is fundamentally different from the Chinese technology companies that typically receive the China discount; consumer internet platforms, social media companies, and domestic technology firms. CLPS provides custom software development, system integration, and IT consulting to financial institutions. The revenue is earned through project-based and time-and-materials contracts with institutional clients who evaluate vendors on technical capability, domain expertise, and delivery reliability. This is a services business, not a product business; the intellectual property is in the team capabilities and client relationships, not in a platform or algorithm that could be targeted by regulatory action. The regulatory risks that apply to Chinese consumer technology platforms; data sovereignty requirements, algorithmic regulation, antitrust enforcement; do not apply to an IT services firm that builds custom software for Western banks.
The client count growth from 225 to 277 between comparable H1 periods is a metric that validates the business development capabilities of the organization. Each new client represents a sales cycle that typically takes six to twelve months in enterprise IT services; from initial engagement through proposal, vendor qualification, pilot project, and full contract execution. Growing the client count by 23 percent year-over-year while simultaneously growing revenue per client demonstrates that the sales team is both acquiring new logos and expanding existing relationships. Client retention is also implicit in the data; if significant client losses were occurring, the net client count growth would be lower. The combination of new client acquisition and existing client expansion is the dual-engine growth model that the best IT services firms use to compound revenue.
The gross margin of 23.1 percent in H1 FY2025 is consistent with IT services companies that rely on development teams in lower-cost geographies. The margin reflects the labor cost arbitrage between the development centers in China; where engineering salaries are lower than in the U.S. or Western Europe; and the billing rates charged to Western financial institution clients. This arbitrage is the structural economic advantage of the CLPS model and it is durable as long as the cost differential persists. However, rising wages in Chinese technology centers, currency fluctuations, and competitive pressure from Indian IT services firms; which offer even lower labor costs in some categories. Are margin risks that need to be monitored. The customized IT solutions segment growing 134.7 percent year-over-year is constructive for margins because customized solutions typically carry higher margins than staff augmentation or commodity development work.
The path to profitability requires continued revenue scale outpacing cost growth, or a shift toward higher-margin service offerings. FY2025 net loss of $7.0M on $164.48M in revenue represents a net margin of approximately negative 4.3 percent; not far from breakeven. EBITDA of negative $3.5M suggests the losses are primarily driven by non-cash items and investment spending rather than fundamental unprofitability of the service delivery model. If revenue continues growing at 15-plus percent while operating expenses are managed, breakeven is achievable within the next one to two fiscal years. GAAP (the standard U.S. accounting rulebook) profitability would be a significant milestone because it would force institutional investors to evaluate CLPS on its financial merits rather than dismissing it based on the China label alone.
The Singapore and Hong Kong expansion provides a geographic hedge that is strategically important beyond the direct revenue contribution. By building delivery capacity in Singapore and Hong Kong; both of which are outside mainland China regulatory jurisdiction. CLPS can serve clients who have China-specific procurement restrictions while maintaining the cost advantages of the broader Asian labor market. Singapore in particular is a major financial services hub with its own regulatory framework, and having a credentialed presence there opens doors to Southeast Asian financial institutions that may prefer a Singapore-based delivery center to a China-based one for their IT development work. This geographic optionality is being built quietly while the market focuses on the China narrative.
The bottom line on CLPS is that the market is applying a blanket China discount to a company whose customers are Western regulated financial institutions, whose U.S. revenue is doubling annually, and whose international revenue outside China nearly doubled in the most recent reporting period. The discount may be appropriate for Chinese consumer technology companies with domestic revenue concentration and regulatory exposure. It is arguably inappropriate for an IT services firm that builds custom software for JPMorgan and HSBC. The gap between the discount the market applies and the discount the business fundamentals justify is the analytical opportunity. If U.S. and international revenue continue growing at their current rates, the geographic revenue mix will eventually make the China discount factually untenable; and the repricing from a discounted multiple to a normalized IT services multiple is where the potential returns are concentrated.
The financial institution vertical specialization is both CLPS greatest strength and its primary concentration risk. The company has built deep domain expertise in banking and financial services IT; trading systems, risk management platforms, regulatory compliance tools, customer onboarding systems, and core banking infrastructure. This specialization allows CLPS to compete for complex projects that generalist IT services firms cannot credibly bid on because they lack the domain knowledge to understand the requirements, the regulatory constraints, and the operational context. However, concentration in a single vertical means that a downturn in financial services IT spending; whether driven by economic conditions, regulatory changes, or technology budget cuts; would affect CLPS disproportionately relative to diversified IT services firms. The client count growth to 277 partially mitigates this risk through diversification within the vertical, but the vertical concentration itself remains a structural characteristic of the business.
The workforce model that CLPS employs, maintaining large development teams in China while serving clients globally; creates both cost advantages and operational complexities. The cost advantage is the labor arbitrage: experienced software engineers in Chinese technology centers command salaries that are 40 to 60 percent lower than comparable engineers in the United States or Western Europe. This arbitrage allows CLPS to bid competitively on projects while maintaining margins that would be unsustainable at Western labor rates. The operational complexity involves managing distributed teams across time zones, maintaining communication quality between client-facing consultants and development teams, ensuring intellectual property security and data protection compliance, and navigating cross-border regulatory requirements for financial services data. CLPS has been managing these complexities successfully for years, but they represent ongoing operational overhead that pure domestic IT services firms do not face.
The customized IT solutions segment grew 134.7 percent year-over-year in H1 FY2026, which indicates that CLPS is moving up the value chain from staff augmentation toward higher-value project-based work. Staff augmentation; providing developers on a time-and-materials basis, is a commoditized service with thin margins and limited pricing power. Customized solutions; building specific systems, platforms, and applications for financial institution clients; commands higher margins and creates intellectual property and institutional knowledge that makes CLPS harder to replace. The shift toward customized solutions improves both the revenue quality and the competitive defensibility of the client relationships.
The international APAC revenue growth from $16.9M to $26.8M in H1 FY2026 demonstrates that geographic diversification is not limited to the U.S. market. Singapore, Hong Kong, Japan, and other APAC financial centers have growing IT services demand from financial institutions that prefer regional development capacity over pure offshore models. CLPS presence across multiple APAC markets provides revenue diversification within Asia that reduces the concentration risk even before considering the U.S. expansion. A regional APAC IT services company serving multiple financial centers has a fundamentally different risk profile than a China-only outsourcing firm.
The valuation disconnect between CLPS financial metrics and its market capitalization (share price multiplied by shares outstanding) is stark when compared to U.S.-listed IT services peers. Companies like EPAM Systems, Globant, and Endava trade at revenue multiples of 2x to 5x. CLPS trades at a fraction of 1x revenue despite comparable growth rates and margin profiles. The entire valuation gap is attributable to the China discount. If the geographic diversification continues and the percentage of revenue from non-China sources reaches 40 to 50 percent, the market may begin repricing CLPS toward peer multiples. That repricing from 0.2x revenue to even 1x revenue would represent a significant change in market capitalization.
Dossiers, weekly roundup editions, and podcast notes. Free. No paywall. Unsubscribe anytime.